Biased mods

[Jack]

there is one thing wrong with this forum, favouritism.
The mods here are so immature that they only pick on certain People.

This is why
Yeti says
Jack can ***
Gets away with it
Trozi says ***, gets away with it
I said rsf ***, and I get a ****ing infraction.

The favourites like yeti and trozi get no action taken, however I can
They should be ashamed
Biased modding, therefore this forum is getting worse.

[BK]

I agree.
I've seen it happen.

[Professor Twoe-Toes]

It doesn't happen with favorites most of the time, usually admins choose mods whom they may hate but are loyal and won't abuse their powers and get no or little sas from them

[BK]

It doesn't happen with favorites most of the time, usually admins choose mods whom they may hate but are loyal and won't abuse their powers and get no or little sas from them
My friend, Wilky got an infraction for saying a minor swear word while more popular members were cussing alot worst.

[verac the defiled]

the well known people get away with a lot more then a person that they dont no that well

[Micki]

Flamage never goes over well though Trozi or no Trozi. {{{locked}}}

[Yeti]

My friend, Wilky got an infraction for saying a minor swear word while more popular members were cussing alot worst.
I thought warning's didn't mean much, at the time, and thought I was simply warning him that another mod might infract him for something like that.
Obviously I was wrong, and for that I thought I had apologized :/

there is one thing wrong with this forum, favouritism.
The mods here are so immature that they only pick on certain People.

This is why
Yeti says
Jack can ***
Gets away with it
Trozi says ***, gets away with it
I said rsf ***, and I get a ****ing infraction.

The favourites like yeti and trozi get no action taken, however I can
They should be ashamed
Biased modding, therefore this forum is getting worse.
As for Jack, Trozi doesn't get away with everything. He has quite the list of bans/infractions/warnings along with bad reputation. You shouldn't be so quick as to make assumptions.
I, however, do see where your coming from yet, I think it's not the person that matters in our situations but, the situation itself.
When I made my risque title "Jack Can ***" I was afraid someone would call me out [and if they had I would have removed it immediately] but, the thread was well thought out and a response to your highly controversial corrupt dragon plate legs.
You. however, posted as a response to an announcement, a four word post that directly insulted RSF
woot 3rd up
Rsf ***
And you got a warning, which has no effect on your ban status. Just a little reminder to "Hey, don't do that again!"
Not only that, but being so quick to jump to conclusions and call out the staff directly, don't you think it would have been more favorable to yourself to just PM an admin if you believed the infraction was unjust?


Yet, all in all, I do think I see favoritism a bit around here but, I believe the staff does their best to keep it to a minimum. Favourtism is always going to be a part of life, whether it's fair or not, the goal is to keep it to a minimum (and there are better ways then just insulting the staff via thread in off-topic.)

As for this thread, I just wanted to explain a little more throughly than Micki did.
Hopefully "disrespecting" this lock isn't looked upon as evil..
PM me or another staff member for further questions and the like.
[Re-Locked]